Dear Brother Jawaid Ahmed,
Me: [Yes, it is true that pregnancy is burden for women and men do not have it but i say it is one the reasons that men should support women but it cannot be the main reason] and i'm advocate of the verse 4:34 but i would like to defend it by reason. Therefore, in addition to motherhood of women there should be other reasons that the Quran appoints men as providers of women and not vice-versa, beacuse men must provide women even if these women are not mother of any children and 4:34 is not conditional.
Maybe this is a superiority/advantage and does not need any reason such as dowry that men should give to women not vice-versa.
i'm sure the Dear translator of QXP can solve this problem and help me to understand the logic behind this decree.