Our Beacon Forum

Re: why MBS is no Ataturk.
By:Shahalam, TX
Date: Sunday, 25 March 2018, 10:53 pm
In Response To: Re: why MBS is no Ataturk. (Sidqi.ca)

Saudia kingdom by tradition has its family and social contract, bondage between king, junior kings, royal families, administrative rulers, public very strong. Despite MBS's radical idea liberating women from their cage, country hasn't reacted to the kind of religious 'Bhagdar', if he were in Pakistan. The country despite its conservative religiousity, did not show 'Ya Allah Lubbak' kind of Dharna in the streets of Riyadh and Jeddah. This is good sign and MSB's ambitious agenda to reboot Kingdom according to modern time will bear fruit. It is always instructive to compare conservative ideas with the dictates of current time, within the bound of moral life.

Messages In This Thread

Saudi Prince Muhammad’s religious moderation
James M. Dorsey, USA -- Friday, 23 March 2018, 5:32 pm
Re: why MBS is no Ataturk.
Sidqi.ca -- Saturday, 24 March 2018, 4:32 am
Re: why MBS is no Ataturk.
Sidqi.ca -- Sunday, 25 March 2018, 11:37 am
Re: why MBS is no Ataturk.
Shahalam, TX -- Sunday, 25 March 2018, 10:53 pm