You do not have to agree with anything someone has to say but if you disagree then it must be for a logical reason backed by proof.
I do not accept that everything belongs to an Islamic State, I do not think Parwez meant this but only those resources that belong to the whole population and and not usurped and exploited by a greedy minority. Example, Russia and the gas and oil oligarchs who buy English football teams. Individuals who have more power and infliuence than some heads of state, GIVEN TO THEM BY A CORRUPT SYSTEM.
My understanding is that individuals can keep what they earn, do with it what they want, buy what they want, keep what they have. BUT when we have an Islamic state they will have the opportunity to invest what they earn in the state for the benefit of all, including them self. This includes healthcare, education, water, energy, road and transport and social housing which the state organises and maintains for all. These 'belong' to the state so that all benefit and is paid for by what we earn, Zakat in action.
Exposition of the Quran was a unique way of bringing the meaning of the Quran ahead instead of a literal translation which many cannot understand or interpret. QXP built upon this and is the way forward for a better understanding of the Quran.