Dear brother Mubashir,
Mr Ghamidi is a funny twister.
How does he know for sure that the prophet a.s. kept a beard? Did he see it? Through Hadees? Nothing but a warehouse of forgery and conjecture.
On the one hand he states that keeping beard is a sign of love for prophet Mohammad (a.s.)
On the other hand he does not keep a beard himself.
Conclusion: By his own admission then he does not love the prophet (a.s.)
A smart speaker is not necessarily a good scholar and a smart speaker often gets stuck in the web he himself spun.
After insulting Sir Syed, Mirza Hairat, Mufti Abduh, Allama Mashriqi, Allama Barq, Allama Iqbal and most of all, the great Allama Pervez - all at different times, Ghamidi deserves no respect.
You may rightly say the great men were only humans, but his own self-contradictions, irrationalities and stupidities abound in his lectures. Such are too many to point out but I will try to collect them for you in two short videos.
But there is hardly any need. Look at his extremely harsh criticism of Allama Pervez on this forum. Ghamidi has been bent upon hating and ridiculing him. Ghamidi maligned the Allama's explanation on Surah An-Naml concealing from you the fact that all the terms used by Pervez in that Surah are present in top class dictionaries like Tajil Uroos. Ghamidi tries to deceive you that Allama Pervez made them up himself. Please check Tajil Uroos.
Ghamidi's ill intentions about Pervez immediately became obvious to me when he chose Surah An-Naml to comment on, the Surah that contains many metaphors and allegories.
Someone rightly said on the forum that Mr Ghamidi is completely ignorant of the language of revelation.