Our Beacon Forum

Shooting rampage in Qandhar: Madness?
By:Muhammad Rafi, Karachi
Date: Sunday, 18 March 2012, 6:29 am

Madness is not the reason for Kandahar massacre

Robert Fisk

17th March, 2012

I’m getting a bit tired of the “deranged” soldier story. It was
predictable, of course. The 38-year-old staff sergeant who massacred
16 Afghan civilians, including nine children, near Kandahar this week
had no sooner returned to base than the defence experts and the
think-tank boys and girls announced that he was ‘deranged’. Not an
evil, wicked, mindless terrorist — which he would be, of course, if he
had been an Afghan, especially a Taliban — but merely a guy who went
crazy.

This was the same nonsense used to describe the murderous US soldiers
who ran amok in the Iraqi town of Haditha. It was the same word used
about Israeli soldier Baruch Goldstein who massacred 25 Palestinians
in Hebron — something I pointed out in this paper only hours before
the staff sergeant became suddenly ‘deranged’ in Kandahar province.

“Apparently deranged”, “probably deranged”, journalists announced, a
soldier who “might have suffered some kind of breakdown” (The
Guardian), a “rogue US soldier” (Financial Times) whose ‘rampage’ (The
New York Times) was “doubtless (sic) perpetrated in an act of madness”
(Le Figaro). Really? Are we supposed to believe this stuff? Surely, if
he was entirely deranged, our staff sergeant would have killed 16 of
his fellow Americans. He would have slaughtered his mates and then set
fire to their bodies. But, no, he didn’t kill
Americans. He chose to kill Afghans. There was a choice involved. So
why did he kill Afghans?

There’s an interesting clue to all this – not that you’d have found it
in the reports. Indeed, the Afghan narrative has been curiously
lobotomised – censored, even – by those who have been trying to
explain this appalling massacre in Kandahar. They remembered the holy
Quran burnings – when American troops in Bagram chucked the holy book
on a bonfire – and
the deaths of six Nato soldiers, two of them Americans, which
followed. But blow me down if they didn’t forget – and this applies to
every single report on the latest killings – a remarkable and highly
significant statement from the US army’s top commander in Afghanistan,
General John Allen, exactly 22 days ago. Indeed, it was so unusual a
statement that I clipped the report of Allen’s words from my morning
paper and placed it inside my briefcase for future reference.

Allen told his men that “now is not the time for revenge for the
deaths of two US soldiers killed in Thursday’s riots”. They should, he
said, “resist whatever urge they might have to strike back” after an
Afghan soldier killed the two Americans. “There will be moments like
this when you’re searching for the meaning of this loss,” Allen
continued. “There will be moments like this, when your emotions are
governed by anger and a desire to strike back. Now is not the time for
revenge, now is not the time for vengeance, now is the time to look
deep inside your souls, remember your mission, remember your
discipline, remember who you are.”

Now this was an extraordinary plea to come from the US commander in
Afghanistan. The top general had to tell his supposedly
well-disciplined, elite, professional army not to “take vengeance” on
the Afghans they are supposed to be
helping/protecting/nurturing/training, etc. He had to tell his
soldiers not to commit murder. I know that generals would say this
kind of thing in Vietnam. But Afghanistan? Has it come to this? I
rather fear it has. Because – however much I dislike generals – I’ve
met quite a number of them and, by and large, they have a pretty good
idea of what’s going on in the ranks. And I suspect that General John
Allen had already been warned by his junior officers that his soldiers
had been enraged by the killings that followed the Koran burnings –
and might decide to go on a revenge spree. Hence he tried desperately
– in a statement that was as shocking as it was revealing – to
pre-empt exactly the massacre which took place last Sunday.
Yet it was totally wiped from the memory box by the “experts” when
they had to tell us about these killings. No suggestion that General
Allen had said these words was allowed into their stories, not a
single reference – because, of course, this would have taken our staff
sergeant out of the “deranged” bracket and given him a possible motive
for his killings. As usual, the journos had got into bed with the
military to create a madman rather than a murderous soldier. Poor
chap. Off his head. Didn’t know what he was doing. No wonder he was
whisked out of Afghanistan at such speed.

We’ve all had our little massacres. There was My Lai, and our very own
little My Lai, at a Malayan village called Batang Kali where the Scots
Guards – involved in a conflict against ruthless communist insurgents
– murdered 24 unarmed rubber workers in 1948. Of course, one can say
that the French in Algeria were worse than the Americans in
Afghanistan – one French artillery unit is said to have “disappeared”
2,000 Algerians in six months – but that is like saying that we are
better than Saddam Hussein. True, but what a baseline for morality.
And that’s what it’s about. Discipline. Morality. Courage. The courage
not to kill in revenge. But when you are losing a war that you are
pretending to win – I am, of course, talking about Afghanistan – I
guess that’s too much to hope. General Allen seems to have been
wasting his time.

Messages In This Thread

Shooting rampage in Qandhar: Madness?
Muhammad Rafi, Karachi -- Sunday, 18 March 2012, 6:29 am
Shooting rampage - 20 US Troops Behind It
Tom Feeley, USA -- Sunday, 18 March 2012, 4:26 pm