Brother what would a real person, a human, if you think of it as one, feel being referred to as property that needed to be distributed among men as you just did with the help of history? Perhaps you can never understand unless you are there in that place yourself.
Why are not women given any other choice what to do with themselves lets not get into that. Let Allah decide once the hour comes. And ...Howallah ul Haq!!!
Even after going through all that discussion you still would LIKE to go for that option in the NAME of fear of Allah and history OR your own desires, whatever excuse you may have the thing is the truth will be there.
What is very clear is that neither you nor brother Ijlal want to believe in truth but whatever you have been hearing from majority other wise neither of you have been able to prove your points from Quran! You still can't prove from Quran multiple marriages were in any case allowed from 4:3 unless you resort to history! that of course you will. And for brother Ijlal, he is still stuck to his point that multiple marriages are allowed in any case through his so called "logic", although he could not prove 24:32,33 are not mere suggestion but direct orders which he again cannot prove to be "to marry off singles". Well he has the same thinking as yours: Not follow the truth but what majority says or what one owns self desires(probably he wishes to marry another one or already has another woman or one in his family perhaps!)
As for brother Ijlal's LOGIC, according to it then, men can marry men and women can marry women as it has not been categorically said in Quran that it is haram to do so!!! This logic of his is exactly what the homos use for their case. Can he prove these according to his own logic? The only way he can is by resorting to history or ahadiths then, which will only prove why he needs them (ahadiths) afterall!!!